Authors
- Fomina Marina A. PhD (Philology), docent
Annotation
The paper investigates into the semantic structure that features elemental forces being predicative actants. The studу proves relevant as the semantic structure with an elemental agent corresponds to a variety of Russian models — active, passive and impersonal ones. The paper makes a structural and semantic analysis of the models
specifying their status within the system of semantic roles with a special focus on the semantic component being active (+/–). The analysis is based on a sample of Russian
sentences collected from the Russian National Corpus. The complex research procedure features hypothesis-deduction method (with semantic experiment as its integral part), corpus-based experiment and the analysis of search engine results. The paper 1) determines the status of elemental forces of nature as Causers within the typology of actants; 2) describes the criteria applied to collect the empirical data from the Russian National Corpus; 3) makes a structural and semantic analysis of the models that convey information about elemental forces of nature. The findings contribute to the development of the functional approach to linguistics «from semantic structures to linguistic means», i. e. «from meaning to form».
How to link insert
Fomina, M. A. (2022). SUBJECT IN RUSSIAN MODELS THAT CONVEY INFORMATION ABOUT ELEMENTAL FORCES OF NATURE AND THEIR SEMANTIC COMPONENT BEING ACTIVE (+ / –) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №4 (48), 126. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.48.4.10
References
1.
1. Mustajoki, А. (2006). Functional syntax theory: from semantic structures to linguistic means. Jazyki slavjanskoj kultury. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Fomina, М. А. (2020). Experiencer as quasi-agent: «from meaning to the linguistic form». Issues of Applied Linguistics, 40, 112−136. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Suleimanova, О. А. (1999). Problems of Russian syntax: Semantics of impersonal sentences. Dialog-MGU. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Suleimanova, О. А. (2001). Impersonality: relevant semantic features. Philology and Culture: Proceedings of the III International Conference, Tambov, May 16–18, 2001, 81−82. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Fomina, М. А. (2016). Conceptual categories within the framework of an approach to semantic metalanguage. In T. D. Shabanova (Ed.). Contensive Aspects of Language: Constancy and Variation: A Collection of Papers for the Anniversary of O. A. Suleimanova, 223−233. FLINTA. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Salnikov, N. M. (1977). Impersonal sentences like «kryshu sorvalo vetrom». Russian Linguistics, 3, 271−292. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Green, M. C. (1980). On the Syntax of Impersonal Sentences in Russian, a Study of the Sentence Type «Vetrom uneslo lodku». Cornell.
8.
8. Suleimanova, О. А. (1993). Once again about sentence type Kryshu sorvalo vetrom. A collection of scientific papers of the Moscow State Linguistic University, 417, 62−76. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Melchuk, I. A. (1995). Russian language in the «Meaning-Text» model. School «Languages of Russian Culture», Wiener slawistischer Almanach. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Mustajoki, А., Kopotev, М. V. (2005). Lodku uneslo vetrom: conditions and contexts of the use of Russian impersonal constructions involving an external force. Russian Linguistics, 29, 1–38. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Mustajoki, А., Sabitova, Z. К., Parmenova, Т. V., Biriulin, L. A. (2019). The Functional syntax of the Russian Language: a textbook for universities. Urait. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Galkina-Fedoruk, E. M. (2012). Impersonal sentences in modern Russian language. LIBROKOM. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Selezneva, G. A., Suleimanova, O. A., Fomina, M. A. (2006). Linguistic experiment and its place in experimental science. Semantic analysis of language and speech units: processes of conceptualisation and structure of meaning: Second reading in the memory of O. N. Seliverstova, Moscow, October 17, 2005, 256−272. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Suleimanova, O. A., Fomina, M. A., Tivyaeva, I. V. (2020). Principles and methods of linguistic research. Jazyki Narodov Mira. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Verbs: Ideographic Description. English equivalents. Synonyms. Antonyms (1999). L. G. Babenko (Ed.). AST-PRESS. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Suleimanova, О. А., Fomina, М. А. (2018). Triangulation as a research method in experimental linguistics. Russian Studies and Comparativism. Research papers in philology, 12, 220–235. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Kustova, G. I. (1998). Derived values with an experimental component. Semiotika i informatika, 36, 19−40. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Seliverstova, O. N. (1982). Semantic types of predicates. Nauka. (In Russ.).