Authors
- Romanova Galina Ivanovna Doctor of Philology, docent
Annotation
The article considers the issue of literature dominating the cultural identification of readers in the process of its perception. It is emphasized that historical and literary studies, traditionally focused on the personality of the writer or the immanent properties of works, are to take into account the features of the addressee, the reading environment, as well as the theory and methodology of reader-response criticism. It is stated that the assimilation of cultural, including literary phenomena, recognized in the society as exemplary, influential, relevant, guarantees the readers are involved in the societal and cultural environment, contributes to their self-identification,
revealed through the positive attitude to life and culture of their people. The study presents example of the impact produced by the works by Grigorovich and Maupassant, depicting ordinary people on Leo Tolstoy’s creative pattern.
How to link insert
Romanova, G. I. (2023). FICTION PERCEPTION AS A FACTOR OF READERS’ CULTURAL IDENTIFICATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023, №2 (50), 17. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2023.50.2.02
References
1.
1. Guerrero, L. K., Andersen, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2020). Close Encounters: Communication in Relationships (6th ed.). SAGE Publishing. (In English).
2.
2. Yuldasheva, F. (2018). Globalization, understanding self-identity, and formation of new personality. European science review, 396–398. (In English).
3.
3. Vyunnik, E. D. (2000). Problems of culture and national identity. Culture in the modern world: experience, problems, solutions: scientific and informational collection RSL, Issue 2, 48–60. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Lisenkova, A. A. (2018). Features of the formation of Russian cultural identity. Values and Meanings, 2(54), 69–82. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Monin, M. A. (2017). Culturology and/or Culturе studies. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 1, 78–84. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Vedernikova, Yu. V. (2017). Contemporary Sociology of Literature: Pierre Bourdieu’s «Field of Literature» Theory. Science today: facts, trends, forecasts: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Marker, 120–125. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1997). Text problem. Collected works: in 7 vols. Vol. 5, 306–326. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Vinokur, G. O. (2010). Language culture. Komkniga. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Vyazemsky, P. A. (1878). Complete works: in 12 vol. Vol. 1. Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Gogol, N. V. (1994). Collected works: in 9 vol. Vol. 7. Russkaya kniga. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Khalizev, V. E. (2005). Value orientations of Russian classics. Gnosis. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Ingarden, R. (1962). Research in Aesthetics. Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Mandelstam, O. E. (1987). Word and culture. Sovetskij pisatel’. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Iser, V. (2004). The process of reading: a phenomenological approach. Contemporary Literary Theory: An Anthology. Flinta, 201–223. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Gukovsky, G. A. (1966). The study of literature in school. Prosveshchenie. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Tolstoy, L. N. (1953). Complete works: in 90 vol. Vol. 66. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo hudozhestvennoj literatury. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Tolstoy, L. N. (1983). Collected works: in 22 vol. Vol. 15. Hudozhestvennaya literaturа. (In Russ.).