Authors
- Rayskina Valeria Alexandrovna PhD (Philology)
Annotation
The paper presents the description of a personal library perceived as an example of cognitive and communicative space, that has a significant impact on creative
and philosophical consciousness. The study reveals that the library of French renaissance writer, philosopher, and humanist Michel Montaigne is a channel of mediated intercultural communication as well as of diachronic interaction of world’s perceptions.
How to link insert
Rayskina, V. A. (2022). WRITER’S LIBRARY AS A COGNITIVE AND COMMUNICATIVE SPACE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №4 (48), 118. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.48.4.09
References
1.
1. Vikulova, L. G., Zheltukhina, M. R., Gerasimova, S. A., Makarova, I. V. (2020). Communication. Theory and practice. VKN. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Dialogue of cultures. Culture of Dialogue: Human and New Socio-Humanitarian Values. (2017). NEOLITHIC. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Markova, T. B. (2009). Library-museum as a place of memory. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Ser. 6. Iss, 4, 87–91. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Ilyina, O. N. (2003). Personal libraries as a source on the history of culture. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, 1(1), 63–69. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Ratz, M. V. (2021). Notes on Bibliophilia. https://www.fondgp.ru/publications/ notes-about-bibliophilia-2-2/ (In Russ.).
6.
6. Companion, A. (2013). Summer with Montaigne. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Devyataikina, N. I. (2002). The beginning of the formation of the humanistic cult of the book in the era of Petrarch. The book in the culture of the Renaissance, 24–34. The science Press. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Breuil, S. (2013). Découverte d’un manuscrit provenant de la «librairie de Montaigne». Les bibliothèques Virtuelles Humanistes. https://bvh.hypotheses.org/639
9.
9. Popugaeva, A. Yu., Vikulova, L. G. (2016). Formation of the communicative space of the National Library of France. Prospects of Science – 2016. Materials of the IV International Correspondence Competition of Research Papers, 58–62. Knowledge. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Sedykh, A. P. (2012). National literature and communicative culture of the nation. MCU Journal of Philology. Theory of Linguistics. Linguistic Education, 2(10), 16–20. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Krasnykh, V. V. (1998). Virtual reality or real virtuality? Human. Consciousness. Communication. Dialogue-MGU. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Karasik, V. I. (2004). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Gnosis. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Montaigne, M. E. (2021). Les Essais, d’apres l’exemplaire de Bordeaux. The Montaigne project. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/efts/ARTFL/projects/montaigne/
14.
14. Montaigne, M. (2015). Experiments: a complete edition in one volume. Eksmo Press. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Villey, P. (1910). Note Sur La Bibliothèque de Montaigne. Revue d’Histoire Litteraire de La France, 17(2), 335–353.
16.
16. Gagnebin, C. (2009). La figure de Socrate dans les essais de Montaigne. Revue de theologie et de philosophie, 141, 237–242.
17.
17. Yanzina, E. V., Korneev, O. V. (2015). On the question of the role of grammar in the creation of the language of ancient Greek philosophy. Indo-European linguistics and classical philology, 19, 1034–1050. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Tareva, E. G., Yazykova, N. V. (2018). Factors of modernization of school education in the subject area «foreign languages». Foreign languages at school, 4, 2–8. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Vikulova, L. G. (2016). French writer of the 17th century: encyclopedic dominance, linguistic competence, communicative leadership. Ancient and New Romania, 17, 266–278. (In Russ.).
20.
20. Maingueneau, D. (2013). Le contexte de l’oeuvre littéraire. Enonciation, écrivain, société. Dunod.
21.
21. Mikhailova, S. V. (2011). Literary salon of the 17th century as a factor of paratopia. MCU Journal of Philology. Theory of Linguistics. Linguistic Education, 1(7), 108–113.
22.
22. Discourse as a universal matrix of verbal interaction. (2018). URSS: Lenand.
23.
23. Grinev-Grinevich, S. V., Sorokina, E. A. (2015). Polysemy in common and special vocabulary. Vestnik MGOU. Series: Linguistics, 4, (51–64).