Authors
- Fanyan Nelly Yur’evna Doctor of Philology, professor
Annotation
The article features the theoretical analysis and empirical interpretation of conflict communication being also of a fundamental scientific nature. The study proves relevant due to the integrative nature of the theoretical elaboration on the problem, which requires systematization, determination of scientific approaches consistency as of the humanitarian field. The hypothesis considers the integrative approach to the study of conflict communication which contributes to constructing an integral model demonstrating the virtual nature of conflictogenicity that is coupled with other components of the discursive and argumentative model to contribute to performing a deterrent function in a real communication conflict situation. The article aims at substantiating the coherence of theory and practice provisions and modeling a system of parameters, which is a relevant tool for analyzing a conflict situation. The empirical data include a completed text script of a conflict situation in the «Neighbors» chat that arose while discussing a routine issue. The paper reveals the relevance of the projective method, identifies and describes the parameters of an integrative model of non-conflict communication, which includes the components of the discursive model: participants, their roles, goals, values, strategies and tactics, speech genres (discursology), the main conflictogens (conflictology), general requirements for the dispute (argumentology). The findings contribute to the development of communication theory and practice as well as intercultural communication when studying a specific format of chat communication. They allow us to supplement our understanding of effective communication, relying on conflict interaction studies in the area of everyday life communication.
How to link insert
Fanyan, N. Y. (2022). INTEGRATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF CONFLICT IN CHAT COMMUNICATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №3 (47), 72. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.47.3.05
References
1.
1. Formanovskaya, N. I. (2014). Rechevoe obshhenie i kommunikativnoe vzaimodejstvie. Russkaya rech`, 4, 55–58. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Karasik, V. I. (2000). O tipax diskursa. V. I. Karasik & G. G. Sly`shkin (red.). Yazy`kovaya lichnost`: institucional`ny`j i personal`ny`j diskurs. Peremena, 5–20. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Yazy`kovoj analiz mediatikesta: monografiya. (2018). [Аvt.: E. G. Borisova, S. A. Dondo, A. Ya. Esayan; pod obshh. red. E. G. Borisovoj]. MGPU. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Zheltukhina, M. R., Vikulova, L. G., Serebrennikova, E. F., Gerasimova, S. A., Borbotko, L. А. (2016). Identity as an Element of Human and Language Universe: Axiological Aspect. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (IJESE), 11 (17), 10413–10422.
5.
5. Kravchenko, A. V. (2016). O vrede strukturalizma dlya zdorov`ya obshhestva: yazy`k kak e`kologicheskaya nisha cheloveka. E`kologiya yazy`ka i kommunikativnaya praktika, 1, 354–370. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Akaev, V. X., Ismailova, L. M. (2021). Sovremennaya civilizaciya: ot dostizheniya novy`x texnologij k krizisu gumanizma. Nauchny`j al`manax stran Prichernomor`ya. 2(17), 3–7. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Vasil`kova, V. V. (2008). E`volyuciya issledovatel`skix paradigm v teorii kommunikacii. Kommunikativny`e praktiki v sovremennom obshhestve. Skifiya-print, 11–20. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Umarova, Z. Ya., Khasaeva, T. M., Tagirova, R. A., Generdukaeva, Z. Sh. (2019). From tolerant Consciousness to World Cognition. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EPSBS. Conference: SCTCGM 2018 – Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism. Grozny, 2018. Published by the Future Academy, 645–652.
9.
9. Shaxovskij, V. I. (2020). Sovpadenie smy`slovy`x pazlov kak uslovie e`ffektivnosti sovremennoj kommunikacii. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika, 3, 34–52. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Lemke, J. L. (2003). Texts and Discourses in the Technologies of Social Organization. Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 130–149.
11.
11. Mubarak, A. (2016). Usage of Whatsapp as a Social Media Platform among Undergraduates in Kwara State. http://www.researchgate.net
12.
12. Issers, O. S. (2011). Diskursivnaya praktika kak nablyudaemaya real`nost`. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta, 4, 227–232.
13.
13. Fedorova, O. V. (2014). Psixolingvistika vs. Kognitivnaya lingvistika na karte sovremennoj kognitivnoj nauki. Socio- i psixolingvisticheskie issledovaniya, 2, 7–20. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Belous, N. A. (2008). Konfliktny`j diskurs v kommunikativnom prostranstve: semanticheskie i pragmaticheskie aspekty` [Avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.19. Krasnodar]. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Gilbert, М. А. (1997). Coalescent Argumentation. Mahwah, New Jersey.
16.
16. Baranov, A. N. (1990). Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentacii (kognitivny`j podxod) [Avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.01; 10.02.19. Moskva]. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Ivin, A. A. (2009). Sovremennaya logika. Vek 2 (In Russ.).
18.
18. Egides, A. P. (1999). Psixotexnika sintonnogo obshheniya. https://bookscafe.net/book/egides_arkadiy-psihotehnika_sintonnogo_obscheniya-159499.html. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Nigmatzyanova, A. A. (2016). Konfliktogennost` v sovremennom rossijskom obshhestve. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul`turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy` teorii i praktiki, 1(63), 113–115. (In Russ.).
20.
20. Kardashina, S. V., Shan`gina, N. V. (2015). Istoriya stanovleniya ponyatiya «konflikt », strategii i stili povedeniya v konfliktnoj situacii. Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 1, 199–205. (In Russ.).
21.
21. Ryaguzova, E. V. (2017). Sociokul`turny`e kody` i psixologicheskie granicy` sosedstva. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psixologiya. Pedagogika, 1 (17), 89–94. (In Russ.).
22.
22. Kramkova, O. V. (2011). Yazy`kovy`e i pragmaticheskie faktory` konfliktogennosti. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 6–2, 332–335. (In Russ.).
23.
23. Konflikt v yazy`ke i kommunikacii: sb. st. (sost. i otv. red. L. L. Fedorova). (2011). RRGU: Institut lingvistiki. (In Russ.).