Authors
- Devyatova Nadezhda Mikhailovna Doctor of Philology, associate professor
Annotation
The article examines the comparative potential of the subject name and the role in arranging the comparative space. The subject name often creates a figurative
comparison and appears in constructs with a person making the object of comparison. The cognitive possibilities of the name and the comparison estimation rank are due to the situations that determine the person-object interaction. Separate groups of subject names are considered: representing everyday situations, items of clothing and different types of space.
A comparison score is usually created by a comparative constant in concordance with the comparison standard. The study represents cases of atypical subject name compatibility and ways of creating figurativeness. A subject name can create a different perception, both negative and positive. The positive evaluative potential is created by the names of spatial meaning defining the nearest space — the house and its components — charged with the positive energy of home.
How to link insert
Devyatova, N. M. (2021). THE SUBJECT WORLD OF COMPARISON Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (46), 48. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.46.2.05
References
1.
1. Devyatova N. M. Shodstvo kak sravnitel’ny’j smy’sl i ego yazy’kovy’e reprezentacii. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Russkaya filologiya». 2011; (2): 7–13. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Litvinov Yu. V. Tipologiya obraznosti sravnenij (na materiale russkogo i anglijskogo yazy`kov): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19. L.: LGU; 1990. 20 s. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Cheremisina M. I. Sravnitelny’e konstrukcii russkogo yazy`ka. M.: URSS, 2020. 270 s. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Gargani A. Poetic Comparisons: How Similes Are Understood. Salford: University of Salford, 2014. 366 p.
5.
5. Kry`lova M. N. Kakie sravneniya naibolee populyarny`. Russkaya rech. 2008; (5): 80–83. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Kry`lova M. N. Pravilno li my` sravnivaem. Russkaya rech. 2014; (6): 44–49. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Devyatova N. M. Podobno i KAK: o sravnitel’ny`x modelyax s predmetny`mi aktantami. Tekst. Struktura i semantika. Doklady’ XI mezhdunarodnoj konferencii. T. II. M.: Sportakadempress, 2007: 220–225. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Devyatova N. M. Tvoritel’ny`j sravneniya: znachenie i funkcii v tekste. Russkij yazy`k v shkole. 2008; (10): 47–51. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Rahilina E. V. Kognitivny`j analiz predmetny`x imen: semantika i sochetaemost`. M.: Russkie slovari, 2000. 416 s. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Kazmirchuk O. Yu. Rol` sistemy` zaglavij v xudozhestvennom universume cikla B. L. Pasternaka «Peredelkino». Novy`j filologicheskij vestnik. 2021; 1 (56): 197–206. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Kolysheva E. Yu. The space of light and darkness in the context of the creative history of M. A. Bulgakov`s novel «The Master and Margarita». Current issues of the Russian language teaching XIV. Simona Koryčánková, Anastasija Sokolova (eds.) Masaryk University Press. Brno, 2020: 163–173. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Koly’sheva E. Yu. Prostranstvo «vechnogo doma» v istorii teksta romana M. A. Bulgakova «Master i Margarita» Filologicheskie nauki. 2021; 1: 107–118. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Kazmirchuk O. Yu. Stixotvorenie B. L. Pasternaka «Letnij den`» v kontekste «peredelkinskogo » cikla. Novy`j filologicheskij vestnik. 2008; 1 (6): 188–193. (In Russ.).