Authors
- Malakhova Victoria L. PhD (Philology), Associate Professor
Annotation
The article deals with the specificity and benefits of the functional shift method. The relevance of application of the method lies in an opportunity for a comprehensive study of English discourse sense space formation and factors influencing its transformation. The author defines the concept of sense, describes the algorithm for transforming discrete meanings into the integral sense, and analyses the process of understanding and interpretation of the discursive sense by communicants. The conclusion is drawn about the significance of the functional shift method, which allows characterizing the dynamics of English discourse sense formation and a set of factors leading to modification in its structure and functions.
How to link insert
Malakhova, V. L. (2022). APPLICATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL SHIFT METHOD TO THE ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE SENSE TRANSFORMATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №1 (45), 86. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.45.1.09
References
1.
1. Haugh M., Jaszczolt K. M. Speaker intentions and intentionality. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics / ed. by K. Allan & M. K. Jaszczolt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012: 87–112.
2.
2. Kolesov I. Yu. Interpretiruyushhaya funkciya yazy`ka: Perceptivno-prostranstvennaya akcentuaciya v kartine mira. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Ser. «Filologiya. Teoriya yazy`ka. Yazy`kovoe obrazovanie». 2020; 37 (1): 67–81. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Aleksandrova O. V. Kognitivno-diskursivny`e texnologii v interpretacii yazy`ka i rechi. Kognitivny`e issledovaniya yazy`ka. 2015; (23): 59–63. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Belyaevskaya E. G. Semantika v trex paradigmax lingvisticheskogo znaniya: (Kriterii vy`bora metoda). Paradigmy` nauchnogo znaniya v sovremennoj lingvistike: sb. nauch. trudov. M.: INION; 2008: 64–81. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Ponomarenko E. V. O funkcional`noj samoorganizacii rechevy`x sredstv v anglijskom delovom diskurse. Vestnik SamGU. 2013; 106 (5): 80–84. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Khramchenko D. S. Functional-linguistic parameters of English professional discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2019; 1 (1): 9–20. DOI: 10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-9-20
7.
7. Levinson S. C. Three levels of meaning. Grammar and Meaning / ed. by F. Palmer. Cambridge University Press; 1995: 90–115.
8.
8. Lüngen H., Bärenfanger M., Hilbert M., Lobin H., Puskäs C. Discourse relations and document structure. Linguistic Modeling of Information and Markup Languages. Contributions to Language Technology / ed. by A. Witt, D. Metzing. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010: 97–123. (Text, Speech and Language Technology. Vol. 41).
9.
9. Knott A., Sanders T., Oberlander J. Levels of representation in discourse. Cognitive Linguistics. 2001; (12): 197–209.
10.
10. Cruse A. Meaning in language. An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (Oxford textbooks in linguistics). Oxford University Press; 2004. 441 p.
11.
11. Cambridge Dictionary. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/ (data obrashheniya: 15.09.2021).
12.
12. Bronnik L. V. Kognitivno-sinergeticheskij podxod k yazy`ku: filosofsko-metodologicheskij analiz: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filos. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu; 2013. 51 p. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Gabecz A. A. Pragmalingvisticheskij potencial rechevy`x xarakteristik personazhej v proizvedeniyax Dzheka Keruaka: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Samara; 2012. 200 p. (In Russ.).