Authors
- Markina Lyudmila V. D. Sc. (Philology), docent
- Budanova Maria A.
Annotation
The article examines the phenomenon of speech auto-aggression (self-aggression), which is very common in the virtual space. The relevance of the study is due to the need to study this extremely topical and relevant modern phenomenon, to identify factors contributing to the developing auto-aggression and individual’s auto-aggressive
speech behavior, leading to problems concerning person’s mental health, often determining such negative consequences as psychological tension, discomfort, various kinds of conflicts. The outcome effects societal stability. This need is also due to the enormous impact of the virtual communication environment on its users. The purpose of the study is to consider the phenomenon of auto-aggression in virtual space from the point of view of its gender properties. The article aims at considering the content, describing the conditioning factors as well as linguistic features of texts with auto-aggression in terms of gender specificity of their implementation in the Internet, identifying the typical features of an Internet user’s axiosphere. The Sources of empirical material are the sites Women.ru, Just lady, as well as the platforms: Anti-women forum «Antiwomen» and Forum of the Maskulist project. The material for analysis included 366 statements with the identified semantics of auto-aggression. The research methods are the following: general scientific methods of material analysis and synthesis, discourse analysis, method of linguistic commentary on linguistic facts. Results. The greater tendency of women to verbal selfaggression in the Internet environment in comparison to men was confirmed. The authors identified the reasons that were triggers for auto-aggression in men and women to be later described in a comparative manner. Gender linguistic features of texts with auto-aggressive semantics are specified. There was greater expressiveness of male auto-aggression compared to females. The analysis of empirical material leads to the conclusion that verbal auto-aggression in its large-scale manifestation on the Internet, which is currently already a form of social reality, is dangerous being the evidence of psychological discomfort, emotional tension, anxiety in the large groups of the population, which does not contribute to the psychological health of the society and is fraught with negative consequences . The results obtained also lead to believe that the identified gender features of verbal auto-aggression in Internet communication are largely determined by the influence of society, the axiosphere of modern domestic reality.
How to link insert
Markina, L. V. & Budanova, M. A. (2024). SPEECH AUTOAGGRESSION IN INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS AND ITS GENDER FEATURES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 3 (55),
References
1.
Literatura
1. Anosova, S. V. (2008). An aggressive component of polemical texts and illustrations in a modern newspaper [Dissertation for the PhD (Philology): 10.01.10. Voronezh]. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Vorontsova, T. A. (2006). Speech aggression: a communicative and discursive approach [Dissertation … Doctor of Philological Sciences: 10.02.19. Chelyabinsk]. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Grigoriev, P. E. (2020). On the connection between intuition and self-aggression as a possible marker of suicidality. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 2, 15–24. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Dolgopolova, V. S. (2016). Autoaggression as a protective mechanism in the process of personality formation. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research, 11, 665–667. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Kashirsky, D. V., & Myasnikova, O. V. (2020). The phenomenon of women’s self-objectification: an analysis of foreign studies and a look through the prism of domestic psychology. National Psychological Journal, 4, 61–74. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Kon, I. S. (2010). Masculinity in a changing world. Voprosy filosofii, 5, 25–35. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Koshel, P. V. (2015). Genre characteristics of Internet commentary (based on the material of French-language popular science blogs) [Dissertation for the PhD (Philology): 10.02.05. Moscow]. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Markina, L. V. (2018). Slang expletive nominations and characteristics of women in modern youth communication: gender stereotypes. Russian language and literature in professional communication and multicultural space (pр. 197–204). Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Pero, Amirit. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Markina, L. V., & Sipatova, E. N. (2015). On the question of the functions of swear words in modern youth communication. Russian literature and modern problems of education (pp. 162–167). Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. MarK. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Minigulova, G. Z. (2010). Aggression in language and speech: theoretical issues of linguistic representation (based on the material of the Russian and Bashkir languages). The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series 2: Philology and the Arts, 3, 162–167. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Ruzhenkov, V. A. (2008). On the issue of clarifying the content of the concept of «autoaggressive behavior». Nauchno-medicinskij vestnik Central’nogo Chernozem’ya, 32, 20–24. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Sedov, K. F. (2003). Speech aggression in interpersonal interaction. Direct and indirect communication (pр. 196–212). College.
13.
13. Semenikhina, M. V. (2008). The relationship between the features of reflection and images of parents in men and women [Dissertation for the PhD (Psychology): 19.00.01. Moscow]. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Steksova, T. I. (2013). Verbal aggression in Internet comments as a manifestation of social tension. Political Linguistics, 3, 77–81. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Tereshonok, T. V., & Eisner, L. Yu. (2016). Features of self-esteem of middle-aged women with different social status. The Social and economic and humanitarian magazine, 4, 173–190. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Trofimova, G. N. (2013). Features of negative trends in mass communication. Materials X International Congress on Applied Psycholinguistics (pp. 174–176). (In Russ.).
17.
17. Cherkasova, M. N. (2011). Speech forms of aggression in media texts. Monograph. Rostov State Transport University. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Chernova, A. A., Kim, V. V. (2022). A review of Russian and foreign studies on the problem of autoaggressive personality behavior. Psihologiya. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovaniya, 11 (6A), 262–271. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Shcherbinina, Yu. V. (2008). Verbal aggression. Izdatel’stvo LKI. (In Russ.).
20.
Istochniki
20. Women.ru (2023, November 10). https://www.woman.ru/
21.
21. JUST LADY (2023, November 10). http://forum.justlady.ru/
22.
22. Antibabskij forum. (2023, November 10). https://antiwomen.ru/index.php
23.
23. Maskulist: manosfera i mesto obshcheniya muzhchin. (2023, November 10). https://masculist.ru/