Home Releases 2020, №4 (40)

Transformation of Approaches to Computer-Mediated Communication Studies within the English-Speaking Scientific Community

Young Scientists’ Platform , UDC: 316.47:004 DOI: 10.25688/2076-913X.2020.40.4.10

Authors

  • Ageyeva Nataliya Sergeyevna Postgraduate of the Department of Roman Philology, Institute of Foreign Languages, MCU. E-mail: ageevans@mgpu.ru

How to link insert

Ageyeva, N. S. (2020). Transformation of Approaches to Computer-Mediated Communication Studies within the English-Speaking Scientific Community Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2020, №4 (40), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2020.40.4.10
References
1. Istochniki
2. O'Reilly Network website. What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. [E'lektronny'j resurs]. URL: http://oreilly.com/web2/ archive/what-is-web-20.html (data obrashheniya: 31.08.2020).
3. Literatura
4. Zheltuxina M. R. Tropologicheskaya suggestivnost' mass-medial'nogo diskursa: o probleme rechevogo vozdejstviya tropov v yazy'ke SMI: monografiya. M.: In-t yazy'-koznaniya RAN; Volgograd: Izd-vo VF MUPK, 2003. 656 s.
5. Ionina A. A. Osobennosti sozdaniya i vospriyatiya teksta v internete // Vestnik MGPU. Ser.: Filologiya. Teoriya yazy'ka. Yazy'kovoe obrazovanie. 2010. № 2 (6). S. 33-39.
6. Shhipicina L. Yu. Komp'yuterno-oposredovannaya kommunikaciya: lingvisti-cheskij aspekt analiza. M.: Krasand, 2017. 296 s.
7. Carr C . T. CMC Is Dead, Long Live CMC!: Situating Computer-Mediated Com­munication Scholarship Beyond the Digital Age // Journal of Computer-Mediated Commu­nication. 2020. № 25 (1). P. 9-22.
8. Gibbs J. L., Ellison N. B., Heino R. D. Self-Presentation in Online Personals: The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Inter­net Dating // Communication Research. 2006. № 33 (2). P. 152-177.
9. Haans A., Ijsselsteijn W. Mediated social touch: A review of current research and future directions // Virtual Reality. 2006. № 9 (2-3). P. 149-159.
10. Herring S. C. The co-evolution of computer-mediated communication and com­puter-mediated discourse analysis // Analysing digital discourse: New insights and future directions / eds. P. Bou-Franch, P. Garces-Conejos Blitvich. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. P. 25-67. [E'lektronny'j resurs]. URL: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/adda.pdf (дата обращения: 31.08.2020).
11. Lea M., Spears R., de Groot D. Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2001. № 27. P. 526-537.
12. O'Sullivan P. B., Carr C. T. Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the massinterpersonal divide // New Media & Society. 2018. № 20. P. 1161-1180.
13. Sprecher S. Initial interactions online-text, online-audio, online-video, or face-to-face: Effects of modality on liking, closeness, and other interpersonal outcomes // Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. № 31. P. 190-197.
14. Walther J. B. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hypersonal interaction // Communication Research. 1996. № 23 (1). P. 3-43.
15. Yao M. Z., Ling R. What Is Computer-Mediated Communication? An Introduc­tion to the Special Issue // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2020. № 25 (1). P. 4-8.
Download file .pdf 270.84 kb