Authors
- Grishaeva Lidiya Evgenievna
Annotation
Reflections on the specific features of the generation and perception of texts of various types focus on the analysis of current trends in the organization of texts, including semantic, syntactic, functional, and semiotic dimensions. A multifaceted and comprehensive analysis of these trends is conducted using the texts created by Loriot as commentaries preceding opera performances. In Loriot’s texts, tendencies characteristic of different text types — such as hybridization, creolization, expressivity, emotivity, carnivalesque elements, subject orientation, stylistic diffusion, the penetration of oral communication traditions into written texts and vice versa, and the dialogization of monologic texts — are manifested with particular clarity and intensity. These texts synchronously and coherently integrate information from different types of reality: real, fictional, and virtual. The tendency toward dialogization is described as manifesting itself to varying degrees and through different
mechanisms. Two types of dialogization are distinguished: explicit and implicit. The primary criterion for their differentiation is the degree to which principles of text organization that originally functioned in direct interaction of language speakers penetrate monologic texts, which traditionally existed in oral and/or written communication, both mediated and face-to-face. Through the analysis of formally monologic yet dialogized texts, heterogeneous and multilevel means of dialogization are identified, the most significant of which are elements belonging to the functional-semantic field of modality. For these elements, the function of dialogizing a monologic text becomes secondary, while the primary function — the expression of different types of modality (above all, specific forms of objective and subjective modality) — is not lost in the process of dialogization but rather layered onto the secondary function. Text dialogization is interpreted as a manifestation of tendencies inherent in contemporary information society, primarily those oriented toward subjectivity, hedonism, and the prioritization of individual needs. Consequently, textual space — regardless of its textual typological characteristics — is understood as a space for the dialogue of traditions, opinions, interpretations, and views, while the text itself is viewed as an interface between real, fictional, and virtual realities.
How to link insert
Grishaeva, L. E. (2026). TEXT AS A SPACE FOR THE DIALOGUE OF TRADITIONS, OPINIONS, INTERPRETATIONS, AND VIEWS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2 (62), 64. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-913X-2026-262-64-81
References
1.
1. Anisimova, E. E. (2019). Religious discourse: functional and anthropological aspects. Monograph. MSLU. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Anisimova, E. E., & Mileeva, O. A. (2024). Religious discourse: anthropological and linguocultural aspects. Monograph Triumph. (In Russ.).
3.
3. The interaction of texts, discourses and codes in the semiotic space of culture. (2025). A collective monograph. L. A. Kozlovа (Ed.). AltGPU. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Grishaeva, L. I. (2025а). The ratio of objectified and non-objectified information about the world in the interaction of native speakers and culture. In L. A. Kozlova (Ed.). Interaction of texts, discourses and codes in the semiotic space of culture (p. 127–171). A collective monograph under scientific. AltGPU. (In Russ.).
5.
5. The paradoxical norm in language and communication. (2025). A collective monograph. L. I. Grishaeva, I. A. Merkulova (Eds.). Voronezh State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Pastukhov, A. G. (2014). Dynamization of media text properties. The subject of cognition and communication: linguistic and intercultural aspects (p. 174–195). Collection of scientific papers dedicated to the anniversary of L. I. Grishaeva. Nauka-Unipress. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Pastukhov, A. G. (2024). On speech dynamics. Language, communication and the social environment, (22), 36–43. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Shilikhina, K. M. (2014). Semantics and pragmatics of verbal irony. Monograph. Nauka-Unipress. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Linguistic norm in synchrony and diachrony: cultural heritage or encroachment on self-expression? (2023). Monograph. N. N. Germanova, V. A. Pischalnikova (Eds.). Rema. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Berndt, F., & Tonger-Erk, L. (2013). Intertextualitӓt. Eine Einführung. Erich Schmidt Verlag.
11.
11. Fix, U. (2008). Texte und Textsorten — sprachliche, kommunikative und kulturelle Phänomene. Frank & Timme.
12.
12. Grischaewa, L. I. (2016). Makro-Textsortenanalyse: universelles und Kulturspezifisches. In R. Freudenberg-Findeisen (Hg.). Auf dem Weg zu einer Textsortendidaktik. Linguistische Analyse und text(sorten)didaktische Bausteine nicht nur für den fremdsprachlichen Deutschunterricht (S. 69–81). Georg Olms Verlag Hildesheim.
13.
13. Grishaeva, L. I. (2020). Text variation in communication. Monograph. Nauka-Yunipress.
14.
14. Tsvasman, L. (Hrsg.). (2006). Informationsgesellschaft [information society]. Das groβe Lexikon Medien und Kommunikation. Kompendium interdisziplinӓrer Konzepte (134–140). Ergon Verlag.
15.
15. Volkmann, L. (2001). Dialogizität. Metzler Lexikon. Literatur- und Kulturtheorie. Ansätze–Personen–Grundbegriffe (S. 111–112). Verlag J. B. Metzle.
16.
16. Köster, W. (2000). Intertextualität. Metzler Lexikon. Kultur der Gegenwart. Themen und Theorien, Formen und Institutionen seit 1945 (S. 235–236). R. Schnell (Hrsg.). Verlag J. B. Metzler.
17.
17. Vinokur, T. G. (2000а). Dialogic speech. Linguistics (p. 135). The Great Encyclopedia. V. N. Yartsev (Gl. ed.). Bol`shaya Rossijskaya e`nciklopediya.
18.
18. Vinokur, T. G. (2000б). Monologue speech (p. 310). Linguistics. The Great Encyclopedia. V. N. Yartsev (Gl. ed.). Great Russian Encyclopedia.
19.
19. Loriot. (2007). Note. Loriot’s Little Opera Guide (p. 153–155). Diogenes Taschenbuch. (In Russ.).
20.
20. Devkin, V. D. (1979). German colloquial speech: Syntax and vocabulary. Mezhdunarodny` e otnosheniya. (In Russ.).
21.
21. Devkin, V. D. (2015). Language and humor. Monograph. I. P. Amzarakova (Gen. ed.). Xakasskoe knizhnoe izdatel`stvo.
22.
22. Grishaeva, L. I. (2025б). On the importance of the ratio of objectified and nonobjectified information about the world in the reception of the text. German Philology at St. Petersburg State University, Issue 15, 353–380. (In Russ.).
23.
23. Loriot. (2007). Anmerkungen. Loriots Kleiner Opernführer (S. 153–155). Diogenes Taschenbuch.
24.
24. Nozdrina, L. A. (2009). Interpretation of a literary text: poetics of grammatical categories. Drofa. (In Russ.).
25.
25. Nozdrina, L. A., & Nozdrina, A. S. (2023). Lectures on text grammar (with practical tasks to expand professional competence). A course of lectures with practical tasks and tasks to expand professional competence. V. M. Glushak (Ed.). Prometej.
26.
26. Loriot. (2007). Richard Wagner. Der Ring des Nibelungen. Loriot‘s Little Opera Guide (p. 70–94). Diogenes Taschenbuch. (In Russ.).
27.
27. Klix, F. (1984). Memory. Know. Use of knowledge. Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.