Authors
- Tareva Elena Genrikhovna Doctor of Pedagogy, full professor
- Troinikova Ekaterina V. D. Sc. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor
Annotation
Intercultural linguistic education is focused on the humanitarian design of sustainable development of a multicultural multilingual world while developing new and improving existing mechanisms for preparing students for life in the context of cultural diversification. In recent decades, particularly significant studies are devoted to the creation and implementation of constructive linguodidactic systems that ensure (self)development of the student’s personality as a subject of intercultural dialogue, capable and ready to form non-conflict relationships between representatives of different linguistic and ethnic communities. The article is devoted to the theoretical explication of the conceptual basis of one of such systems. This basis is designed with consideration of the role that the modern digital world order plays, on the one hand, in the transformation of traditional models of existence and interaction of cultural and linguistic communities, and on the other hand, in the process of individual (self)development of their representatives. The focus of the author’s research attention is aimed at designing an interdisciplinary basis for designing a system of foreign language training of students for intercultural dialogue in the context of informatization of the surrounding environment. This basis is predetermined by the synergetic in essence and convergent in processuality interdisciplinary methodological context of intercultural linguistic education, aimed at achieving a priori dialogue by participants in intercultural communication in the conditions of the information context. The content of philosophical, communicative-discursive, psycholinguistic, psychological and pedagogical aspects of the conceptual basis of foreign language training of students is described from the point of view of the interaction of two approaches: general scientific information and linguodidactic intercultural. The creation of a conceptual basis for the student training system is necessary for the development and implementation of a methodological system aimed at solving the urgent problem of forming students’ readiness for intercultural dialogue, considering the peculiarities of the information world.
How to link insert
Tareva, E. G. & Troinikova, E. V. (2025). INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE IN THE INFORMATION WORLD: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRAINING Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 4 (60), 158. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-913X-2025-460-158-174
References
1.
1. Kolin, K. K. (2024). The Phenomenon of Information in the Structure of Physical Reality. Physical and Technical Informatics (CPT2024) (p. 11–18). Proceedings
of the XII International Conference, Nizhny Novgorod – Moscow – Pushchino, April 16–18, 2024. Nauchno-issledovatel`skij centr fiziko-texnicheskoj informatiki. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Kolin, K. K. (2022). Education for the information society: problems and priorities. Informacionnoe obshhestvo, (5), 6–34. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Life Online: Digital Transformation of Russian Society. (2025). E. A. Streltsova (Head of the Authors’ Collaboration). Monograph. NIU-VShE`. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Tareva, E. G., & Trojnikova, E. V. (2023). Information modeling of intercultural dialogue: a new strategy in linguistic education. In S. V. Chernen’kaja (Ed.). Language, culture, society: Essentia et existentia (p. 109–129). Monograph. MCU, Knigodel. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Almazova, N. I. (2003). Cognitive aspects of the formation of intercultural competence in teaching a foreign language in a non-linguistic university [Abstract
of the Dissertation … Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences: 13.00.02. Ros. gos. ped. un-t im. A. I. Gercena]. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Kurbatov, V. I., & Papa, O. M. (2017). «Homo informaticus» — a man of the information age: characterological traits. Humanities, Socio-economic and Social Sciences, (1), 46–51. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Trojnikova, E. V. (2022a). Information and strategic readiness of students for intercultural interaction: linguodidactic priorities. Business. Education. Law, 3(60), 288–294. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Koryakovtseva, N. F. (2020). Sociocognitive approach to teaching a foreign language within the framework of the intercultural paradigm of linguistic education. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and teaching, 1(834), 11–22. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Habermas, J. (2001). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Nauka. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Safonova, V. V. (2018). Philosophical binary opposition «dialogue of cultures – not-dialogue of cultures» in lingvodidactic consideration. Prepodavatel` XXI vek, 2, 20–24. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Tareva, E. G. (2019). Culture dialogue education: pro et contra. Rusistika bez granicz, 3(3), 81–85. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Lotman, Yu. M. (1996). Inside thinking worlds. Man-text-semiosphere-history. Yazy’ki russkoj kul’tury’. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Kagan, M. S. (1988). The world of communication. The problem of intersubjective relations. Politizdat. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Karasik, V. I. (2023). Linguocultural characteristics of pedagogical discourse. MCU Journal of Philology. Theory of Linguistics. Linguistic Еducation, 2(50), 118–129. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Kurbatov, V. I., Papa, O. M., & Chernositova, T. L. (2020). Virtual polydiscursivity for discourse community in communication of the information age. Nacional`noe zdorov`e, (1), 143–150. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Obdalova, O. A., Minakova, L. Yu., & Soboleva, A. V. (2017). Discourse as a unit of communicative and speech-thinking process in communication of representatives of different linguistic cultures. Language and Culture, (37), 205–228. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Trojnikova, E. V. (2022b). The subject of intercultural interaction as an educational construct: vectors of dialogue transformation. Language and Culture, (59), 298–319. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Slastenin, V. A. (2006). Subject-activity approach in general and professional education. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, (5), 17–30. (In Russ.).