Authors
- Prom Natalya A. Dr. Sc.(Philology), Associate Professor
Annotation
The article regards the value features of Moscow image created in the middle of the 20th century — the era of the city’s restoration after the war. The relevance of the study is due to the need to focus the attention of modern youth on the values of Muscovites, thanks to which the revival became possible. The article aims at identifying the axiosphere in the specified time-spatial continuum. The method in the study was semiometry, which included the stages of establishing a significant factual base, reconstructing value systems and classifying the data obtained. The study data consisted of 112 value judgments and 137 axiogenic situations-episodes, subject to the procedure of linguaxiological analysis. The article clarifies the concepts of anti-values, value judgment and axiogenic situation. The values of the post-war Moscow image included its linguo-axiological features from the point of view of a special chronotope (time and place) and society, which served as the basis for typologization in the work and directions for the axiological description. The study revealed such values as Victory, holiday, renewal, technologies and others, which were included in the group of chronotope values of Moscow. A large group of social values of Muscovites included vital, cultural, group and emotional values. The chronotope values of beauty and cleanness of Moscow, old architectural buildings, their history, names and neighborhood yards; social values of service ranking, high-ranking restaurants and American jazz; as well as the anti-value «lack of laughter» were considered specific for the city of Moscow. The description of the axiosphere requires a large amount of empirical
material to be studied together with the accompanying explanation, the completeness of which cannot be contained within the boundaries of a scientific article. New sources of factual material are going to be obtained in the prospect.
How to link insert
Prom, N. A. (2024). LINGUISTIC AND AXIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE CITY IMAGE: POST-WAR MOSCOW IN A JOURNALISTIC TEXT Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 3 (55),
References
1.
1. Babenko, A. N. (2007). State and legal values. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Law, 9(81), 3–7. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Baraboshina, N. V. (2019). The city image as a sociocultural process. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 6(111), 229–234. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Baranov, I. A. (2020). Cultural myths about Soviet people and the USSR in J. Steinbeck’s «Russian Journal». INITIUM. Fiction: An Experience of Contemporary Reading, 3, 115–118. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Vysokovsky, A. A. (1990). Substantial properties of the environment. In A. A. Vysokovsky, G. Z. Kaganov (Eds.). Urban environment: problems of existence, 15–53. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Glukhova, O. V., Evsyukova, T. V., & Kazanskaya, E. V. (2022). The problem of axiological variability of the cultural vocabulary in a pandemic. Bulletin of the Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series: Social and Humanitarian Sciences, 1(1), 137–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.34824/VKNIIRAN.GUMNAUKI.2022.1.1.017 (In Russ.).
6.
6. Gorelova, Yu. R. (2019). The image of the city in the perception of citizens. Heritage Institute. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Dvoryashina, V. S. (2020). Features of the composition of «The Russian Diary» by John Steinbeck. Philology. Theory & Practice, 13(8), 1, 63–67. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Karasik, V. I. (2019). Language bridges of understanding. Discourse. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Kokina, K. V. (2019). Vectors of the evolution of value guidelines of the personal axiosphere in modern media discourse. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 18(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2019.2.1 (In Russ.).
10.
10. Mises, L. (2020). Theory and history. Interpretation of social and economic evolution. Society. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Polyakov, O. Yu., & Polyakova, O. A. (2019). Problems of reception and representation of «another» culture in J. Steinbeck’s «Russian Diary». Philology and Culture, 2(56), 184–189. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Prom, N. A. (2021). The method of subject positioning to identify axiological characteristics (by the example of a media text). Verhnevolzhski philological bulletin, 4, 135–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.20323/2499-9679-2021-4-27-135- 143 (In Russ.).
13.
13. Serebrennikova, E. F. (2015). Axiological dimension of discourse. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University, 21(732), 128–137. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Serebrennikova, E. F. (2011). Semiometry as a method of axiological analysis. In L. G. Vikulova (Ed.). Linguistics and axiology: ethnosemiometry of value meanings (pр. 41–48). Tezaurus. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Tertychny, A. A. (2018). Journalism in modern Russian media: reflection and practice. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 23(1), 95–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2018-23-1-95-102 (In Russ.).
16.
16. Morris, M. W. (2013). Values as the Essence of Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 14–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022113513400
17.
17. Vieyt, R. (2022). Social values and their role in society. Global Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 11(2), 001–002. https://www.internationalscholarsjournals.com/articles/social-values-and-their-role-in-society.pdf
18.
18. Wheeler, M. A., McGrath, M. J., & Haslam, N. (2019). Twentieth century morality: The rise and fall of moral concepts from 1900 to 2007, PLoS One, 14(2): e0212267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212267