Authors
- Tribunskaya Nina A.
Annotation
The article describes the process of discourses interaction within the framework of political statements on Twitter. Sports, ideological and ecological types of discourses
are considered, demonstrating thematic and terminological diversity. It has been established that the language of politics actualizes the features of discursive heterogeneity,
manifested in the polydiscursivity and interdiscursivity of political communication.
How to link insert
Tribunskaya, N. A. (2022). THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION OF DISCOURSES IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №3 (47), 150. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.47.3.13
References
1.
1. Trump, Donald. President Trump @POTUS (45th President of the United States) Twitter.com. https://twitter.com/potus
2.
2. Biden, Joe. President Biden @POTUS (46th President of the United States)Twitter. com. https://twitter.com/potus
3.
3. Dijk, T. A. van. (2008). Discourse and Context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 267 p. https://www.academia.edu/5345314/Discourse_and_Context_Teun_A_van_Dijk
4.
4. Dijk, T. A. van. (1998). What is Political Discourse Analysis? http://www.discourses. org/OldArticles/What%20is%20Political%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf
5.
5. Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1996). Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2. Discourse as Social Interaction. L.
6.
6. Chilton, P., Schäffner, C. Discourse and Politics. Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, I. Ed. by Teun A. van Dijk. L., Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 206–229.
7.
7. Karasik, V. I., Sly`shkin, G. G. (2021). Tendencii razvitiya sovremennogo diskursa. Aktual`ny`e problemy` filologii i pedagogicheskoj lingvistiki, 1, 14–31. http://philjournal.ru/upload/2021-1/FullVersion2021-1.pdf (In Russ.).
8.
8. Tribunskaya, N. A., Shevchenko, V. D. (2021). Diskursivny`e struktury` v politicheskoj kommunikacii. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriya, pedagogika, filologiya, 27(3), 118-127. DOI: http://doi. org/10.12287/2542-0445-2021-27-3-118-127 (In Russ.).
9.
9. Shevchenko, V. D. (2008). Vvedenie v teoriyu interferencii diskursov: monografiya. SamGUPS. (In Russ.). http://engphil.samsu.ru/laniuscms/docs/tipolog/shevchenkomon.pdf (In Russ.).
10.
10. Beloglazova, E. V. (2010). O variativnosti proyavleniya diskursnoj geterogennosti. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 332, 5–19. http://journals.tsu.ru/uploads/import/845/files/332-015.pdf (In Russ.).
11.
11. Plotniczkij, Yu. E. (2020). Realizaciya kategorii «interdiskursivnost`» v angloyazy` chnom pesennom diskurse. E`volyuciya i transformaciya diskursov: sb. nauch. st. Vy`p. 5, 125–139. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Shejgal, E. I. (2000). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Peremena. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Crystal, D. (2011). Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. NY: Routledge.
14.
14. Axrenova, N. A. (2016). Internet-lingvistika: novaya paradigma v opisanii yazy`ka interneta. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika, 3, 8–14. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2016-3-8-14 (In Russ.).
15.
15. Dobrosklonskaya, T. G. (2019). Medialingvistika: sistemny`j podxod k izucheniyu yazy`ka SMI. https://rucont.ru/efd/244207. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Kasavin, I. T. (2008). Tekst. Diskurs. Kontekst. Vvedenie v social`nuyu e`pistemologiyu yazy`ka. Kanon+. (In Russ.).