Authors
- Ganiev Zhurat Valiyevich Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor
Annotation
It appears a rare case in rhetoric when one text features the methods of analyzing two rhetorics — both the antique and the one that 1950s saw getting the title of «common », «new» (Chaime Perelman). This article is a representation of the abovementioned method applied. Any literary genius takes the first steps in creativity and, regardless of his subsequent assessment to trace the improving creative trends of the now famous author (to study the complete works, preferably with drafts; pre-edited works and variations of the one and the same work). The reinterpretation of classical rhetoric and the formation of general rhetoric proved the result of its cooperation with stylistics, which was successfully applied in the analysis of poetic (more broadly, literary and artistic) speech. Representatives of both old and new rhetoric believe that their ultimate goal is to teach ways and means of persuasion.
How to link insert
Ganiev, Z. V. (2021). RHETORICAL MOTIVES IN I. A. BUNIN’S EARLY LYRICS (I) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (46), 83. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.46.2.08
References
1.
1. Bezmenova N. A. Ocherki po teorii i istorii ritoriki. M.: Nauka; 1991. 215 s. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Xazagerov G. G., Lobanov I. B. Ritorika. Rostov n/D.: Feniks; 2004. 384 s. (In Russ.).
3.
3. B`aly`y G. A. S. Ya. Nadson. S. Ya. Nadson. Poln. sobr. stixotvorenij. M.; L.: Sov. pisatel`; 1962: 5–49. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Bunin I. A. Avtobiograficheskaya zametka. Bunin I. A. Sobr. soch.: v 9 t. Т. 9. M.: Xud. lit.; 1967: 253–266. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Chistova I. S. Kommentarii. Lermontov M. Yu. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Pravda; 1988: 660–713. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Bunin I. A. Nad mogiloj S. Ya. Nadsona. Bunin I. A. Sobr. soch.: v 9 t. T. 1. M.: Xud. lit.; 1965: 455–456. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Roshhin M. M. Ivan Bunin. M.: Molodaya gvardiya; 2000. 329 s. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Avelichev A. K. Vozvrashhenie ritoriki. Obshhaya ritorika: рer. s francz. / Zh. D`ubua, F. Pir, A. Trinon i dr.; obshh. red. i vstup. st. A. K. Avelicheva. M.: Progress; 1986: 5–25. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Obshhaya ritorika: рer. s francz. / Zh. D`ubua, F. Pir, A. Trinon i dr.; оbshh. red. i vstup. st. A. K. Avelicheva. M.: Progress; 1986. 392 s. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Gordeyeva O. M. Lichnoe mestoimenie “ty” i funkcional`no-semanticheskoe pole adresovannosti v lirike I. A. Bunina. Vestnik MGPU. Ser.: Filologiya. Teoriya yazy`ka. Yazy`kovoe obrazovanie. 2016; 1 (21): 100–106. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Ganiev Zh. V. Ritorika dushevny`x potryasenij (analiz e`sse V. P. Astafyeva «I praxom svoim»). Vestnik MGPU. Ser.: Filologiya. Teoriya yazy`ka. Yazy`kovoe
obrazovanie. 2019; 1 (33): 48–55. (In Russ.).